Lord of the Rngs
Critical Evaluation of The Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the RingPeter Jackson, the movie picture director from Heavenly Creatures and The Frighteners, has done it again. A New Zealand born native has made some of the most goriest pictures that were ever produced. He has transformed one of the most intriguing fantasy books, which was always a dream of his, into a three part movie trilogy. The outcome of this burdensome task is a superb film. He had the right mix of team, talent, financing, and location to make a story so fanciful come to life. His incredible intuitions and skills were seen thoughtout. It is a wonderful, eye-catching, film. The screenplay by Jackson was remarkable, given how much material he had to discard and condense in order to make the transition to the screen, while still remaining true to the original. As best said by himself, “I wanted to take moments from the book and use modern technology to give audiences nights unlike anything they have experienced before.” His talent exceeded anyone’s belief that such a masterpiece could be created with such brilliance. This movie rates among one of the top three of all time. New Line Cinema and Wingnut Films Production presented Lord of the Rings: The Fellowshi
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Middle Earth, Frighteners Zealand, City USA, Fellowship Ring, JRR Tolkiens, Mount Doom, Peter Jackson, Baker Fellowship, Elf King, Christopher Lee, fellowship ring, middle earth, rings fellowship, lord rings fellowship, battle scenes, mount doom, won awards, sound effects, movie picture, peter jackson, hundred thirteen dollars, rings fellowship ring, grossed hundred thirteen, good-versus-evil plot,
Approximate Word count = 1273
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|