Animal Rights

activists believe animals have inherent legal and moral rights, just as humans do.

According to this viewpoint it is unethical to use animals for any purpose,

whether for pets, research, recreation, clothing, or as food (Press 17). Animal

use in testing is a huge controversial issue. Some believe animals have the same

rights as humans and should for no reason be used as test subjects for research.

Others, including members of medical and scientific communities say it is

unethical not to use animals in research because animal experiments can lead to

medical discoveries that improve the health and well-being of both humans and

animals (Leepson 304). Human health will not improve without animal

There is of course two sides to this issue. Worldwide, animals are used in

numerous experiments which inflict pain and suffering to the animal. The first

testing of animals started over one hundred years ago. Since then, animal

testing has been a source of emotional conflict for humans. In 1966, the Animal

Welfare Act took place (307). This was the start of the animal rights movement.

Over the years, animal activists hav

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Rights Activists, Richard Pothier, Gloria Barry, United Unfortunatly, Medical Association, , Cave Hamm, Animal Activists, Liberation Front, Treatment Animals, animal rights, animal testing, research animals, organ transplants, animal rights activists, surgical procedures, animals research, using animals, balloon angioplasty, rights activists, rights movement, animal rights movement, animal rights animal, balloon angioplasty treatment, based reason values,
Approximate Word count = 2395
Approximate Pages = 10 (250 words per page double spaced)