Welfare
"No one likes the current welfare system." As described in a report edited by Isabel V. Sawhill, an author of The Urban Institute, not many individuals were pleased with the welfare system preceding its reform in 1996. Governors complained that federal law was overly prescriptive, and were willing to take less federal money in return for more flexibility. The public believed welfare to be an "anti-work" and "anti-family" program. Welfare recipients found dealing with the system degrading and demoralizing; most would prefer to work. At this time, many believed that welfare benefits (including food stamps) were insufficient to move a family above the poverty line. It did not provide sufficient state flexibility, did not encourage work, did little to reduce poverty, especially among children, and was responsible for the breakdown of the family, especially for a "rising tide of out of wedlock births."The following year, the Welfare Reform bills were passed. These bills would substantially thwart the current social conflicts on this subject. They would replace Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) with block grants to the states with a fixed federal payment. They would also prohibit states from using federal mo
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Welfare Reform, Stamp Program, Urban Institute, Medicare Medicaid, Children AFDC, , Census Bureau, welfare reform, welfare recipients, january 2000, poor families, 4 january 2000, Institute- Potential, 4 january, Isabel Sawhill, decrease dependency government, believed welfare, welfare spending, welfare benefits, getting job, changes welfare, changes welfare spending,
Approximate Word count = 882
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
 |
