Dr. Faustus
n the history of the play's criticism, the problem of its genre produced the most controversy. I submit here that thiscritical conflict is based on confusion: the discourse meaning (textual) and the interpretative meaning (contextual) have been mistakenly separated. I regard the monologic understanding of genre, as a readymade form containing the content, to be restrictive and prefer to use Bakhtinian definition of genre as 'a form shaping ideology.' The problem of identifying the genre of the play thus ceases to be an either/or choice between morality and tragedy, allowing an interpretative space for more holistic readings. Realizing that the generic dichotomy does not have to be resolved negatively, gives room to a fuller understanding of the work. According to Mikhail Bakhtin, genre is a cultural position from which perspective one views the world not merely a set of conventions. Genre as a particular tradition of vision evolves throughout centuries of representational practice forming a certain path for our present interpretative journey. In a way genre is no more nor less than a specifically patterned form of consciousness. Since Bakhtin sees thinking itself as a dialogic process, genres too engage in a dialogue of heterogl
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Mikhail Bakhtin, Indeed Faustus, Dr Faustus, Similarly Doctor, , Nicholas Brooke, Manicheans Faustus, Doctor Faustus, Faustus Marlowe, Adopting Bakhtinian, doctor faustus, faith faustus, bakhtinian definition genre, choice morality, tragedy hand, life death, morality tragedy, christian tragedy, definition genre, bakhtinian definition, faith faustus refuses, choice morality tragedy, play tragedy,
Approximate Word count = 1602
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
|