God Vs Science
... God or Science Patel 1 Who is all mighty? God or science, faith or knowledge, creation or evolution – these are some of the burning questions that a handful of us on earth are still trying to uncover. ... Science has been clashing with biblical stories long time before Charles Darwin, the renowned British naturalist, published his book “On the Origin of Species” in 1859. ... (Cecie 13) Patel 2 As 18th century progressed, the conflicting thoughts of science and religion resulted into the controversy of existence of God. ... Whereas, on the other side of the coin we have creationist who believe that the reason why we exist today is because of the all mighty creator of all, God. ... Figuring creationists best justification to believe in God, would be the best statement to throw on evolutionists’ face, I conducted a survey to find out what could be the strongest rationale that motivates creationists to believe in God. The results concluded that the prior reason why followers of religion and scholars of religion believe in God is not because of their holy book, is not because their parents and grand parents told them so, is not because scholars of their religion says so, but it is because of their faith in God. ... ” (Faith) Both of these definitions are crying out loud that there is no coherence of existence of God; there is no evidence of Patel 3 existence of God; yet, you have to force your mind to believe in God. Creationists’ reason to believe in God itself is illogical, has no what so ever evidence and kills the instincts of human mind affecting its overall development. ... Thus the only other reasonable explanation for human existence including all living organisms is God, supernatural force required to start the action. (Institue) I can admit too, that it is astonishing and quiet absurd that such complexity in a organism can derive from a single bubble, but if you look at it from a science perspective, then none of this will seem surprising. ... The Patel 5 theory of intelligence design provided by the creationists only suggests that there is direct action by God, which makes the complexity work. (CQ 761) Though this is one of the reasons that can logically prove existence of God, there is no such definition of intelligence design yet provided by creationists to argue further. Steve further points out that if God created intelligence design, did God create a dull design too. ... (CQ 761) If God has created the design of human, then there are some holes in God’s design.