|
Papers > Art > main differences between acting for cinema and acting for stage
Featured Papers from Direct Essays |
|||
1. sXe
|
|||
This is a preview of a paper to view the full text you need to signup and login.
main differences between acting for cinema and acting for stage |
|||
|
In the cinema the actor must think and let his thoughts work upon his face. ... A theatrical performance requires magnification; a cinema performance requires an inner life. – Charles Dullin As this quotation suggests, the most important difference between stage acting and film acting lies in different spatial and temporal dimensions in the two mediums. Although both film and theatre are defined by a certain (limited) space – the frame in film and the proscenium arch in the theatre – the differences in space and time in each medium determine the skills required from film actors and stage actors. In general, the stage actor is much freer in the artistic sense than the film actor, because, the film director has much more control over the performance and projection of the actor. ... An actor has much more chance to create on stage” (Giannetti 217). ... Traditionally, both narrative cinema and drama have their climax towards the end, but the way the story is built up, until the climactic scene, is different as far as the actors’ work is concerned. ... On the contrary, the film actor needs only a minimum of stage technique. ... This is why a number of excellent stage actors look bad or are commonplace in film, and too much stage technique in a film may seem insincere or mannered. Acting in film is almost totally dependent on the style the director chooses. ... In this respect, this style of directing is closer to theatrical acting, where an actor’s whole body is seen on the stage throughout longer sequences. ... The post-World War II era of cinema tended to emphasize realistic styles of acting. ... Since then, this realistic style has become the dominant style of acting in the American cinema as well as the live theatre. ... So there’s a strong connection between the actor’s and the character’s inner life. ... On stage, she would have acted the murder with exaggerated facial expression, but in reality, as Hitchcock observed, human faces tend to hide what people really think or feel. Thus, he didn’t allow Sylvia Sidney to act as if she was on stage, because he wanted to convey the heroine’s emotions through editing. ... As an association, the close-up of the knife and fork comes, which leads to the close-up of the suspicious husband, as he notices the connection between the knife and his wife’s thoughtful face – for the camera pans, rather than cuts, back to the knife. ... The entire scene required very little acting in conventional sense, but the finished sequence delighted the actress. ... Whether the director of film is a realist or formalist, there are fundamental differences between stage acting and film acting. ... Physical requirements are also different in the case of film actors and stage actors. ... The facial features of the film actor don’t have to be large (as in the case of stage actors), the most important requirement is that the face should be expressive, particularly the eyes and mouth. |
|||
To link to this page, copy the following code to your site:
Paper Information |
|||||
Title: main differences between acting for cinema and acting for stage
|
|||||
Signup & Login |
|||||
If you don't currently have a login then Signup here |
|||||
| Pre-Written Papers | |||||
|
|||||
| Custom Papers | |||||
|
|||||
Copyright 2003-2008 doingmyhomework.com. All rights reserved.