|
Featured Papers from Direct Essays
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a preview of a paper to view the full text you need to signup and login.
|
Cases
|
|
|
*35 Young v. Bristol Aeroplane Company, Ltd. House of Lords. HL July 24, 25, 26, 27, 1945; Nov. 29, 1945. Before Viscount Simon, Lord Russell of Killowen , Lord Macmillan, Lord Porter and Lord Simonds. Workmen's compensation -- Action against employer -- Remedies independently of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1925-- Workman's option either to "claim compensation under this Act or take proceedings independently of this Act " --Meaning of "option"--Circumstances in which it must be concluded that workman has exercised his option -- Accident to appellant--Unfenced machinery --Breach of statutory duty--Weekly payments made by employers--Common law claim subsequently brought--Findings of learned Commissioner that on and after Apr. 30, 1942, the appellant accepted the weekly payments knowing them to be made as compensation under the Act; that the appellant when he began to receive such payments did not know that he had an option under Sect.
|
|
|
To link to this page, copy the following code to your site:
|
|
Paper Information
|
|
|
Title: Cases
Words: 718
Rating: None
Pages: 2.9
submitted by: Sumard
If you think this paper shouldn't be here then
|
|
|
|
|
Signup & Login
|
|
|
If you don't currently have a login then Signup here
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Written Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custom Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
