Papers > History > DBQ on loose construction vs strict construction of the constitution in the years of 1801 1817
|
Featured Papers from Direct Essays
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a preview of a paper to view the full text you need to signup and login.
|
DBQ on loose construction vs strict construction of the constitution in the years of 1801 1817
|
|
|
Between 1801 and 1817 the two parties in the national government of the United States traded sides on the issue of loose construction versus strict construction of the Constitution, because they had also traded sides of the power table. The Democratic-Republicans, having gained power, seemed to have abandoned their strict constructionist beliefs and adopted a broader perspective. The Federalists, having lost power, seemed to have dropped the loose construction and adopted strict interpretation. These years show people that political parties sometimes change their values in order to serve their own needs.
During Democratic-Republican rule from 1801-1817, the Jeffersonian-Republicans laid down principles, which were supposed to guide their actions. ...
Jefferson laid down the ideals of a limited national government, a strict construction of the constitution, and a larger trust in the common people; he broke from these beliefs in his domestic policies a number of times. ... The national bank, a tariff on imported goods, and partial payment on the national debt all contradicted Jefferson’s belief in a limited national government and a strict construction of the constitution. Nowhere in the constitution did it give Congress the right to form a national bank. ... Also, when Jefferson purchased the Louisiana territory, he did not adhere to his policy of a strict construction. Nowhere in the constitution did it allow for acquisition of new territory, but Jefferson disregarded his ideals. ...
In 1800 before becoming president, Jefferson wrote to Granger (A) that he still believed in strict interpretation of the Constitution. Even though the Constitution does not specifically state that the president may make purchases using the nation’s funds, Jefferson used a loose interpretation of the Constitution to buy Louisiana anyway. ... The Federalist Party had a severe hatred for the newly implied embargo act, and strived to get it revoked by using a strict interpretation of the constitution on the Democratic-Republicans.
|
|
|
To link to this page, copy the following code to your site:
|
|
Paper Information
|
|
|
Title: DBQ on loose construction vs strict construction of the constitution in the years of 1801 1817
Words: 1437
Rating: None
Pages: 5.7
submitted by: twizzler92
If you think this paper shouldn't be here then
|
|
|
|
|
Signup & Login
|
|
|
If you don't currently have a login then Signup here
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Written Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custom Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
