Papers > History > How far was the inheritance of Charles I responsible for the breakdown in relations between Crown
|
Featured Papers from Direct Essays
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a preview of a paper to view the full text you need to signup and login.
|
How far was the inheritance of Charles I responsible for the breakdown in relations between Crown
|
|
|
When Charles I succeeded the English throne in 1625, no historian has ever denied that the new King was not bequeathed with a variety of problems that had the potential to be responsible for the breakdown in relations between Crown and Parliament during his reign. The problems that need to be taken into account when assessing how far his inheritance was responsible include: the system of finance known as ‘live of his own’, the situation of religion, multiple kingdoms and the existing quarrels with parliament such as the continuous battle of privilege versus prerogative. Some historians have even gone as far to say that these problems made the crisis inevitable. However, other historians have tended to claim that as James had all these problems and crisis never ensued, these problems did not make a breakdown in relations inevitable. They argue that it was other factors and the character of Charles I himself that stirred ‘the coming storms’ as M. ... Nevertheless, in order to assess how far the problems were responsible, it is necessary to look at both sides of the debate. ... This system included a variety of short-term expedients such as the sale of Crown Lands and feudal dues that had more drawbacks than benefits. The main hindrance for Charles, as it had been for James, was that as the system was so weak it meant that he would have to call Parliament in order to gain financial support in the form of a subsidy. ... This had happened to James who being a ‘lavish spender’ had become financially dependent on them and many argue that as he did not reform the system, this created an even greater problem for Charles.
However, other historians argue that the system ‘live off his own’ did not make a breakdown in relations inevitable. Not only do they use the fact that James had the same problem and yet still on the whole had a harmonious relationship with Parliament but also the fact that Charles made the situation of finance worse mainly by insisting upon war with Spain. ... Furthermore, Charles would have to call Parliament who would use finance as a more useful ‘bargaining tool’. ... As a result, Charles would have to deal with the problems of Protestants (i.
|
|
|
To link to this page, copy the following code to your site:
|
|
Paper Information
|
|
|
Title: How far was the inheritance of Charles I responsible for the breakdown in relations between Crown
Words: 1843
Rating: None
Pages: 7.4
submitted by: SweetSarah
If you think this paper shouldn't be here then
|
|
|
|
|
Signup & Login
|
|
|
If you don't currently have a login then Signup here
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Written Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custom Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
