Papers > Politics > House of Commons does little to act as a check on the executive Discuss
|
Featured Papers from Direct Essays
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a preview of a paper to view the full text you need to signup and login.
|
House of Commons does little to act as a check on the executive Discuss
|
|
|
There is a definite argument against the statement that the House of Commons does little to act as a check on the executive but there is also a clear argument for it.
To start by examining the argument against it, it can be seen that one of the main checks on the executive is the confidence vote. If the commons withdraws the confidence vote then the government must resign and therefore the executive must do as much as possible to satisfy all sides and groupings within its own party. In accordance with this rule, it can also be mentioned at this point that no proposed measure can become an act of Parliament without the assent of the House of Commons and therefore in this way the House does act as a check on the executive.
The process through which proposed Bills must travel also reflect a vital function of the commons in acting as a check on the executive. In the commons it proceeds through three stages being the first and second readings and then the committee stage where a select committee examines it in extreme depth. Therefore, through this process there is no way that the executive can introduce any new legislation without the opposition to criticise and scrutinise it, assuming of course that the opposition does actually oppose it which is normally the case.
|
|
|
To link to this page, copy the following code to your site:
|
|
Paper Information
|
|
|
Title: House of Commons does little to act as a check on the executive Discuss
Words: 1124
Rating: None
Pages: 4.5
submitted by: neilhershcovitch
If you think this paper shouldn't be here then
|
|
|
|
|
Signup & Login
|
|
|
If you don't currently have a login then Signup here
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Written Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custom Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
