Papers > Politics > Pledge of Allegiance Deism and Teaching Patriotism
|
Featured Papers from Direct Essays
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a preview of a paper to view the full text you need to signup and login.
|
Pledge of Allegiance Deism and Teaching Patriotism
|
|
|
Ask any number of students that you may pass to recite the Pledge of Allegiance; do they stop in their tracks and think for a moment or do they mindlessly recite the 31 word oath? The Pledge of Allegiance has been ingrained in the minds of anyone that has been in elementary school in this country. ... I haven’t said the Pledge in over 5 years but does that make me anti-American, no. Civics education in a post-September Eleventh America is much too centered on practical patriotism and reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. This mindless drivel has brought to the forefront questions of patriotism and the validity and effectiveness of the Pledge. ...
In 1892 Francis Bellamy, a socialist Baptist minister and assistant to the editor of The Youth’s Companion, penned the Pledge of Allegiance for publication in The Youth’s Companion. ... The wording of Bellamy’s Pledge is as follows: “I pledge allegiance to my flag and the republic for which it stands: one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all” (Baer). The following is Bellamy’s own words about why he wrote his pledge:
It began as salient points of our national history, from the Declaration of Independence onwards; with the makings of the Constitution…with the meaning of the Civil War; with the aspiration of the people… (Baer).
The Pledge was changed in 1924 by the National Flag Conference. ... ” In 1954 the Pledge was once again changed to include the words “under God” directly following “one nation. ... This decision was made when Michael Newdow, an atheist, filed a suit against the Pledge of Allegiance because his 8-year old daughter was forced to listen to fellow students recite the Pledge and because the Pledge, in the form that is now, is endorsed and required by the state it can be construed as state-endorsed religion. The court language says that
The pledge, as currently codified, is an impermissible government endorsement of religion because it sends a message to unbelievers that they are outsiders, not full members of the political community, and an accompanying message to adherents that they are insiders, favored members of the political community.
|
|
|
To link to this page, copy the following code to your site:
|
|
Paper Information
|
|
|
Title: Pledge of Allegiance Deism and Teaching Patriotism
Words: 1720
Rating: None
Pages: 6.9
submitted by: migrantsoul
If you think this paper shouldn't be here then
|
|
|
|
|
Signup & Login
|
|
|
If you don't currently have a login then Signup here
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Written Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custom Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
