Papers > Science > Influence of Suggestibility and Questioning Styles on Eyewitness Memory
|
Featured Papers from Direct Essays
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a preview of a paper to view the full text you need to signup and login.
|
Influence of Suggestibility and Questioning Styles on Eyewitness Memory
|
|
|
Running head: THE INFLEUNCE OF SUGGESTIBILITY AND QUESTIONING
The Influence of Suggestibility and Questioning Styles on Eyewitness Memory
Rodney S. Claborn
Oklahoma State University
The Influence of Suggestibility and Questioning Styles on Eyewitness Memory
Without a doubt, eyewitness testimony plays one of the largest roles of supporting evidence in many trials across the United States varying from a case of a small claims court to the more majestic trials of the Supreme Court. In the event that DNA is not submitted into evidence to convince a jury, an eyewitness can serve as the most critical piece of evidence for a trial. While scientists can accurately match DNA with a human being in order to prove that someone has committed a crime, the accuracy of human memory remains uncertain. Many factors can influence the accuracy of human memory, and an erroneous memory could lead to a possible wrong conviction. In an attempt to maintain a fair judicial system, the accuracy of eyewitness testimony has been experimentally researched. More specifically, a number of experiments have been conducted regarding how suggestibility and various aspects of questioning affect the accuracy of both adult and childhood memories, as shown during eyewitness testimonies.
Suggestibility, in the context of eyewitness memory, is a person’s susceptibility to suggestion. A widely accepted theory is that individual differences in suggestibility exist. In fact, individual differences could affect the memory of an eyewitness during leading questioning. ... The college students were subsequently told that they had reported a number of errors and should try to be more accurate during their second questioning. ... This is partly due to individual differences in suggestibility, namely the strength of a memory trace. These results support the idea that during a leading interrogation, individual differences can affect the memory of an eyewitness.
Repeated questioning has been associated with both positive and negative effects on the accuracy of eyewitness memory reporting. Memon and Vartoukian (1996) studied the effects of repeated questioning on children’s eyewitness testimony.
|
|
|
To link to this page, copy the following code to your site:
|
|
Paper Information
|
|
|
Title: Influence of Suggestibility and Questioning Styles on Eyewitness Memory
Words: 1590 Rating: None Pages: 6.4 submitted by: roddman67
If you think this paper shouldn't be here then
|
|
|
|
|
Signup & Login
|
|
|
If you don't currently have a login then Signup here
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Written Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custom Papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|